well that is somewhat the point/question. As its really just a play environment (but will have some stuff that i would prefer to actually work most of the time) do i just make the plunge to KVM and not worry about XEN at all? even though there are things about XEN that are appealing, like better support for unmodified guests?
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:56 PM, andrew mcelroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Evan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> To go along with the other discussions that have been going on here. I am >> building my live migration VM (2 server) farm and have been reading up on >> what vm system i should use. I am completely un-decided on what to do even >> though tonight i will start the build process. I will be storing the vm >> images on a share on my NAS as disk performance isnt paramount since this is >> really just a project to play around with and learn the technology. KVM and >> XEN seem to be the same in many aspects aside from xens para-virtualization. >> KVM is being "branded" as the up and coming vm system that everyone will be >> using.. Anyone have any thoughts to chime in? >> > > I have heard that KVM is the next big thing, but personally, I use XEN > because it works. > There is a lot of talk of KVM not being ready for production yet. > If you were going to deploy a vm today as either KVM or XEN, I would use > XEN. > > You should be able to migrate a XEN image over to KVM once KVM is deemed > 'ready' > >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
