> > > >> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Manoj Srivastava <[email protected] > >wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Sun, Aug 23 2009, andrew mcelroy wrote: > >>> > > >>> The obvious solution appears to be mandatory, role based access > >>> controls, SELinux would do everything you want. chroots are not > really > >>> meant for security; and virtual machines are overkill. > > > manoj >
If chroots aren't for security, then what are they for? I have reread that statement several times, and it still confounds me. Would you consider SELinux more secure (generally speaking) than BSD Jails? Andrew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
