Just the other week, Chris, I setup an IPSEC site-2-site tunnel between my 
house in Franklin, and my dad’s house in Murfreesboro with pfSense on both 
ends. It took all of 5 minutes to run the wizard on both ends. Both pfsenses 
in my case are virtualized. The new pfSense 2.2 now uses StrongSWAN 
(replacing Racoon) which supports L2Tp over IPSEC. So, it now becomes 
possible to use the native, builtin IPSEC VPN client in Windows 7/8 to do 
mobile IPSEC with pfSense 2.2. I haven’t done it myself, yet, but many have 
reported getting this to work successfully on the pfSense forums during the 
beta and release candidate phases of version 2.2. I’ve used OpenVPN in the 
past too, but not having to have an additional, 3rd party VPN client will 
definitely be attractive to some of my clients.



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Chris McQuistion
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 10:42 AM
To: nlug-talk
Subject: Re: RE: [nlug] I never saw this form of Windows 10 coming!



pfSense supports VLAN interfaces, so you can set it up on a single-NIC 
device and it works great, but you do have to have some kind of managed 
switch to plug it into.  That is what Curt is doing.



I run a little Atom box at home that has two onboard NICs and one PCI card 
NIC and I run pfSense and have multiple WAN connections feeding my single 
LAN.  It also runs OpenVPN and I get great throughput from my office to my 
home, over that VPN.  I love pfSense for these kinds of applications.



Chris



On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Mark J. Bailey <[email protected]> wrote:

Mike,



My interest was the possibility that the Pi 2 might be good/stable/capable 
enough to serve as an embedded device for pfSense (free FreeBSD-based 
firewall akin to Tomato or DD-WRT). I had not looked up through yesterday, 
but in digging on it more, it only has the 1 NIC, which makes it not as 
useful for this for me. I see how Curt is using another compact style, 
single NIC ATOM-based unit for this very same thing, but being a single NIC, 
either the LAN packets or the WAN packets have to be trunked with a VLAN 
using a physical smartswitch that supports VLANs (most of the times, kinda 
pricey, and overkill, for most small offices – at least ~$100+ just for an 
entry-level 8-port unit and rarely available off-the-shelf in retail 
outlets). I suppose one could use a USB-based NIC to add a second one.



The need here is minimally a NIC for LAN and a NIC for WAN/Internet (like 
you see on consumer-grade Netgear and Linksys Internet routers in the office 
supply stores or a Best Buy). The plus for pfSense is that a) it’s FREE, and 
b) it brings with it enterprise-grade networking functions. I know I can 
always turn to a multi-NIC version of an ATOM-based unit similar to what 
Curt’s using, but was hoping the dirt cheap and ultra-compact RasPi2 might 
be suitable for this. While pfSense may be overkill for most small offices, 
everywhere I’ve ever deployed it became AND remained a much less problematic 
client’s site! :)



Obviously, the notion is mostly a novelty one for me at this point, as for a 
business critical item such as an Internet router, most, if not all 
businesses would just pay whatever for whatever gets the job done. But, 
typically, short of having to special order compact ATOM-based units like 
the one Curt’s using, pfSense would be setup with consumer-grade PC hardware 
(and older hardware at that), or virtualized, but neither of these 
approaches is conducive to a small office with a tiny, wall-mounted “IT 
 area” on the side-wall of the closet back by the back door or in the 
kitchen. So, something like a RasPi2 would be well suited for limited space 
scenarios.



Mark





From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Michael L
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 6:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: RE: [nlug] I never saw this form of Windows 10 coming!



Mark J. Bailey, about the FreeBSD NIC setup.

Guess I don't yet know how to participate in the discussion. -M


T-mobile. America's First Nationwide 4G Network

Curt Lundgren <[email protected]> wrote:

Michael L - who is the question directed to?



On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Michael L <[email protected]> wrote:

might I learn more about your interesting possibility?
Mike

T-mobile. America's First Nationwide 4G Network

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected] 
<mailto:nlug-talk%[email protected]>
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected] 
<mailto:nlug-talk%[email protected]>
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to