One of the main reason people are buying this model router is its
compatibility with DD-WRT.
On Nov 1, 2015 10:46 AM, "Mark J. Bailey" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Probably primarily for accounting and warehouse management reasons. If an
> item’s “revision” is essentially the same “thing” (just with
> newer/different guts and/or firmware), they probably wouldn’t want to
> complicate their management of that item. More likely, internally, they
> note the “revision” by a lot# or some sort of date. But to the general
> populous, nothing on the surface has changed. So, it is in essence the same
> item as far as the public is concerned. Can be frustrating to us “in the
> know” folk, yes, but we few aren’t the ones making the company a profit. J
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *Alex Smith (K4RNT)
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 1, 2015 12:23 PM
> *To:* [email protected]; CHUGALUG <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [nlug] Annoyed with TP-Link
>
>
>
> WHY do manufacturers re-use model numbers when they revise the product to
> include new components? Why can't they just sequence the model number to a
> different number when they revise it?
>
>
>
> I recommended for my mom a TP-Link TP-WR841ND, specifically because it was
> on the list of supported devices for DD-WRT, and it came with revision 9,
> which is NOT supported yet.
>
>
>
> WHY?
>
>
>
> I finally found beta versions of DD-WRT, but they're turning out to be
> unreliable. I just installed the latest beta yesterday after the Wi-Fi cut
> out for the second time in a week.
>
>
>
> Why is TP-Link, one of the better supported device manufacturers with
> DD-WRT, becoming like Linksys? I now don't like TP-Link almost as much as I
> hate Linksys.
>
>
>
> </rant>
>
>
>
> " 'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured,
> the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all
> irrevocably.' Those words were uttered by Judge Aaron Satie as wisdom and
> warning... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we’re all
> damaged." - Jean-Luc Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie, Star Trek: TNG
> episode "The Drumhead"
> - Alex Smith
>
> - Kent, Washington (metropolitan Seattle area)
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "NLUG" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "NLUG" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "NLUG" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "NLUG" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to