First off, Tilghman, I, like you, am entitled to my opinion, justified to you 
(or anyone else for that matter), or not!  Second, are you certain that the Red 
Hat * contributed * SRPM spec and related patch files are covered? Could they 
not just publish source patched tar balls of the core source components? What 
constitutes compliance here? And a good chuck of what the spec and patch files 
are also doing are not source modifying, but parameters, config files settings, 
and other items of convention (file/folder naming, locations, and what not), 
etc., which is a big piece of what the RPM approach sets out to do. Is that 
covered? I think with CentOS, we’ve come to expect that the SRPMS and related 
components are covered, but that may have just been Red Hat’s convention to 
more easily comply with the GPL aspects. But that has largely gone away now, 
unless Centos Stream is including all that (and, honestly, I don’t know the 
answer to that, mainly because I haven’t had a chance to look). I’ve worked 
with Linux non-stop since I first download the floppy images for the SLS 
distribution in mid-1992. That said, I’ve always thought that how Red Hat 
released and permitted projects like CentOS to build 100% compatible clones 
from their production line SRPMS was something living on barrowed time. And 
perhaps, Red Hat itself would hold to this position. But Red Hat ain’t really 
“Red Hat” any more, at least not totally. And I recall all too well the days of 
“Big Blue” IBM from late 70s up through the late 80s. Yes, they’ve played 
somewhat “nice” the past 30 years, but that doesn’t mean they will always 
continue doing so. Maybe Centos-Stream will prove out for Rocky and Alma, and 
enable them to continue to mirror RHEL. I truly hope they can. Only time will 
tell. Sent from  <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> Mail for 
Windows From:  <mailto:[email protected]> Tilghman Lesher
 Sent:  Tuesday, October 19, 2021 2:16 PM
 To:  <mailto:[email protected]> NLUG
 Subject:  Re: [nlug] CentOS replacement?OpenSUSE? Ubu20?But that's in effect 
what they would be doing, because publishing the
SRPMS are meeting their requirements under the license for the open
source projects.  Under the various GPL-derived licenses, they are
REQUIRED to publish the changes for any distributed software.  No
longer publishing those changes is, in effect, taking it
closed-source.

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 1:25 PM Mark J. Bailey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> By the way, I never said anything about them taking anything closed source. 
> Just making it a lot harder to remain 100% RHEL compatible (which is what 
> really matters to me).
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows
>
>
>
> From: Tilghman Lesher
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 12:56 PM
> To: NLUG
> Subject: Re: [nlug] CentOS replacement?OpenSUSE? Ubu20?
>
>
>
>
> They really can't do that for most packages, not without violating the
> license of the various projects.  Remember, you can modify software to
> your heart's content, but as soon as you redistribute it, you have to
> include the source code for those changes.  There's far too much
> contributed software for them to be able to switch to closed source.
>
> As to who could take them to court over this, there are multiple
> entities, such as the Free Software Foundation, as well as the
> Software Freedom Conservancy, who have the resources to prevail in
> court, not to mention the immediate revolt within their own ranks, for
> trying to go Closed Source.  There's just no way this scenario would
> succeed.
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:44 AM Mark J. Bailey <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > In theory (litigated, or not), yes. But, should IBM cut off access to the 
> > SRPMS, whose got the money to take them to court over it? Very few other 
> > commercial entities out there depend on Red Hat’s SRPMS, so there’d likely 
> > be little incentive to lay down the consider costs to go after them. 
> > Without those SRPMS, maintaining a free Rocky or Alma (or even having a 
> > CentOS in the first place) would be next to impossible, at least in the 
> > sense of mirroring RHEL. Funny how this aspect is often glazed over. Red 
> > Hat could also share source in a way that makes it much more painful to 
> > even bother with it.
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from Mail for Windows
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Kent Perrier
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 8:54 AM
> > To: nlug-talk
> > Subject: Re: [nlug] CentOS replacement?OpenSUSE? Ubu20?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 6:43 AM Mark J. Bailey <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> And, of course, I can’t help but wonder if it will it eventually get 
> >> “CentOS’d(ead)” by IBM as well.
> >
> >
> > What influence does IBM have over Rocky Linux to kill it? All of the RHEL 
> > code is GPL, Rocky (and Alma) will always have access to it.
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "NLUG" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected]
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> > http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
> >
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "NLUG" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > email to [email protected].
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nlug-talk/CA%2B6_KC96vxbwd_TgNHctyuFfvTyTSBUcG0AL2Yem%3D5guZKtYxw%40mail.gmail.com.
> >
> > --
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "NLUG" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected]
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> > http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
> >
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "NLUG" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > email to [email protected].
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nlug-talk/32768296.117329.1634661845701.JavaMail.zimbra%40mail.jobsoft.net.
>
>
>
> --
> Tilghman
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "NLUG" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "NLUG" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nlug-talk/CAHPkZcVfuFQWiMqF0iLGETjxgxnJ7BaN9iHDvuSpbcZN9%3DUAgg%40mail.gmail.com.
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "NLUG" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "NLUG" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nlug-talk/1325932306.117625.1634667950457.JavaMail.zimbra%40mail.jobsoft.net.



-- 
Tilghman

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nlug-talk/CAHPkZcXZfzS%2Bu2M%2Bcp%2BB1THJ1MZHmcSfdp-0A8Yh5q4j_P0fkw%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nlug-talk/774695258.117891.1634673938377.JavaMail.zimbra%40mail.jobsoft.net.

Reply via email to