We now have something different here then what's in Maven? Or that's
what's proposed. If so I don't think that's really a good idea.
On 14-Jul-08, at 9:40 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
I was never clear on what was wrong with the existing toolchain
implementation.
Shane
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Leopoldo Agdeppa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
brett
Thank you
bong
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
I've taken a look over NMAVEN-147, 148, 168 and they look suitable
to
apply
to me.
Anyone else had a chance to review them first?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
business, and welfare go to ruin completely can
be omnipotent for a while.
-- Jakob Burckhardt
