I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess my ideal mailing list archiver would mangle everything that fit an
> email address regexp.  Of course, the regexp might accidentally match
> something in uuencoded text or something, so it should insert a line
> somewhere in the message warning that mangling had been done.  The message
> could be a hyperlink to a page describing the mangling scheme.  It should be
> easy for a human to manually demangle, but impractical to write a SPAM-bot
> to do it.  For instance, you could include a special string in all the
> mangled names which would be unique to each mailing list (and which
> hopefully wouldn't appear in the URL).
> 
> For instance, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" might get mangled as something
> like ":MANGLED:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:MANGLED:".

Another scheme I've thought about in the past is replacing email addresses
with entries into a table of mangled string translations.  Like
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" would change to something like
"MANGLED_STR=1394=" then you could get the table of mangled string
translations by emailing an autoresponder or submitting a web form.  The
translations would be mailed to you only if you were a subscriber to the
mailing list.  The translations could be in the form of a sed script:

 s/MANGLED_STR=1=/MANGLED_STR/g   # the escaping mechanism needs more thought...
 [...]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/g
 [...]

The translations could also be available by subscription, so that you'd get
a new copy each time a new string was mangled for the first time...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless                   | To prevent SPAM contamination, please 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW.  Thank you.     

Reply via email to