Scott Blachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How about:
> > >
> > > --enable-masquerade='draft_from|mmailid|username_extension ...'
> > >
> > > which you could debate as well...
> >
> > Not terrible, but I've never seen syntax like that.
>
> Well...the |'s usually denote alternatives (e.g. pick this OR that)
> and the "..." for repeat, but not REAL obvious.
Yeah, I know, both of those are common enough -- it's just the combination
that was weird (especially with the '...' being "disembodied" ;^>).
> > --enable-masquerade[='draft_from mmailid username_extension']
> > enable 3 types of email address masquerading [none]
> >
> > would be to say:
> >
> > --enable-masquerade[='MASQUERADE_OPTION_1[ MASQUERADE_OPTION_2...]'
> > enable up to 3 types of address masquerading [none]
>
> Yeah - how about sticking the "up to" in the first of those so that
> you have the list of valid tokens along with an indication of variable
> numbers of them being allowed:
>
> --enable-masquerade[='draft_from mmailid username_extension']
> enable up to 3 types of address masquerading [none]
You're right -- that is the best compromise. Okay, it's in.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless | To prevent SPAM contamination, please
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW. Thank you.
