>Actually I meant what was wrong with your subscription to the list (in case
>it comes up again).
Um, good question. You'd have to talk to Doug about that (I got the
impression from him that it was failing for an unknown reason, so he
added me manually and would debug it later).
>As I recall, most or all of the command-line options that are enabled at
>configure/compile-time time right now just act as if they don't exist if you
>don't enable them. Even the man pages are sed'ed to remove any reference to
>the non-supported options.
>
>There's some merit to that approach, but I'd prefer putting the stuff in the
>man page and just including a note that an option isn't supported unless nmh
>was compiled with support for it. I'd also put the option in the command's
>--help output unconditionally, and have the option print out a message that
>nmh wasn't compiled with support for it if that's the case.
Hmm, I'll look into this. Thanks!
--Ken
