Shantonu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Problem solved. > > Should we start thinking about an nmh-1.0.5? Yes, but I still think we should try to fix as many of the known date parsing bugs in the new dtimep.lex as we can (cf. my previous mails on the subject). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Dan Harkless | To prevent SPAM contamination, please [EMAIL PROTECTED] | do not post this private email address SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW. Thank you.
