Re: Path to SASL shared library now saved in executables

[Neil W Rickert]

Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> (And my vote is to call the next release 1.1).

>I guess the SASL addition may warrant a jump out of the '1.0.x's.  What do
>others think?

It sound ok to me.

Incidently, if you want some "Date:" headers for testing, I can
easily grep out a couple of thousand from sites all over the world.

 -NWR