>No, I agree there hasn't been much work. I think the major sticking >issue for a 1.0.5 was that Dan was not happy with the new date parsing >code. The new code was a bit faster and actually compiled. The old >parser was some crufty code that was being munged with sed in order to >compile. However, the exact data semantics were not identical to 1.0.4.
Well, if _I_ took over (which is just a suggestion at this point), I am perfectly happy to keep your date parsing code. A release needs to be made; not having one is (IMHO) simply Not Acceptable. --Ken
