Shantonu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 16 May 2002, Ken Hornstein wrote: > > one sticking point is that the copyright pedigree of nmh is not clear. > > Currently, the copyright of nmh is assigned to "The Authors of nmh" and > > that's a little fuzzy (also, not all of the source code files have copyright > > assignments, and that's a problem they have as well). > > One definition of "Authors of nmh" is anyone referenced in the ChangeLog, > either as committer, or credited for the patch.
That was what I had in mind when I changed it back in March 2000 (discussed in the "COPYRIGHT is bogus..." thread). Prior to that, it had Richard claiming copyright over the whole thing, which was clearly not kosher. I guess it wouldn't hurt to explicitly define what is meant by "the authors of nmh" somewhere. -- Dan Harkless [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://harkless.org/dan/
