>I expect FSF to be very particular about copyright for projects they >would make part of the GNU project, but for non-GNU software, I'd >figure they would be a little lax. If the license is compatible with >what FSF would accept for a license, why be so anal about copyright >notices?
Their concern was that they couldn't determine to their satisfaction that nmh was free software. I am trying to work with them on the issue, but I haven't heard back from them in a little while. However, if you (or anyone) wants to talk with them directly, please do. You could find out their issues without me being in the middle. --Ken
