In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jon Steinhart writes: > > > Seems to me that my notion of scanning attachments is getting the most > attention here, even though it's not the most important part to me. My > main interest is in being able to read attachments in a more consistent > way. Maybe an example would help... > > Right now, a session looks like this: > > % inc > <scan output> > > % show > (oh, this looks like a multipart message) > > % mhlist > % mhshow -part 1 > % mhshow -part 1.1 > % mhshow -part 2 > (...) > % next > ... > > What I'd like to be able to do is: > > % inc > <scan output> > % show > % next > (show first part of current message) > % next > (show next part of current message) > % next > (...) > % next > (show first part of next message)
Hmm. I'm afraid I disagree about this redefinition of "next". Currently, I don't need to do individual mhshows if I just want to sequence through all the parts: just show, and keep hitting Return, or Ctrl-C to skip a part. Cheers, Dave -- David Chin d w c h i n a t u m i c h d o t e d u "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars."--Wilde http://www.fair.org/extra/0210/inspectors.html This is not the last line of my sig. Del^2 Phi == 0 :)
