Scott Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps "next -part" would be the right user interface (ignoring all > coding considerations) to step thru attachements, leaving "next" for > whole messages.
Agreed. > It seems to me that the main difficulty is that mh stores one message > per file, but MIME ruins that model by introducing nesting. Wonder if something like burst that takes message m with attachments and creates files m.n would be useful... -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and mh-e. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.
