Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Including the additional note about the dangers of using dcc.
> Personally, I use dcc when copying myself and bcc when copying
> someone else.  I personally dislike the bcc behavior of other MUAs
> since they provide no indication to the receipient that they have
> received a blind-carbon copy.  I think the bcc behavior of MH/nmh
> is what all MUAs should do.

Earl and I are in total agreement here.

I can't think of any reasons why we shouldn't document dcc. It works
well with building whitelists with procmail, for example.

Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.

Reply via email to