Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Including the additional note about the dangers of using dcc. > Personally, I use dcc when copying myself and bcc when copying > someone else. I personally dislike the bcc behavior of other MUAs > since they provide no indication to the receipient that they have > received a blind-carbon copy. I think the bcc behavior of MH/nmh > is what all MUAs should do.
Earl and I are in total agreement here. I can't think of any reasons why we shouldn't document dcc. It works well with building whitelists with procmail, for example. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.