Ralph Corderoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > > mailutils-mh is clearly not a mature project yet, since given that it > > rides on top on GNU mailutils once it fully works it should provide > > lots of functionality (POP, IMAP, etc). > > > > This is not meant to be flamebait, so please don't see it as such. > > I'm just wondering about the future of one the engines behind MH-E. > > I was wondering exactly the same; nmh versus a new, clean, code base. > IIRC the recent announcement of a mailutils release said their MH > implementation was happily being used by MH-E now.
Well, the CVS version of MH-E works with it (which will be 8.0), but there are still a few gaps in mailutils-mh compared to nmh. But it's a fast moving target. When I discovered it's existence, I noted that it didn't have an `ali' command. One was coded a few weeks later. I should be using it more to contribute bug reports... Peter _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
