Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Feb 26, 2004: >>Does 2.1 always install sasl.h in a "sasl" subdirectory? If so, >>you could change it from #include <sasl.h> to #include <sasl/sasl.h> to get >>around the problem.
>No, traditionally (installing it from the SASL distribution) it gets >installed in $(prefix)/include. Sigh, another RedHat difference. Strange. On my system, the headers were all installed in $(prefix)/include/sasl The headers for 1.5 were installed in $(prefix)/include >>Otherwise, some autoconf support will be necessary. >Since you can specify CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/include/sasl, I don't think it's That's probably a mistake. The "#include" statements should be specify "<sasl/sasl.h>". It is usually bad practice to list a subdirectory of "/usr/include" in a "-I" directive. -NWR _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
