no difference ... > On 1 July 2004 at 14:35, Vish Parakala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yup, anno seems to work perfectly fine ... > > it's just all other components (which use post/send) > > About 15 years ago, when I started writing the O'Reilly MH book, > I played around a lot with the mostly-undocumented process > environments under MH: how certain environment variables passed > from a parent process to its children would alter the behavior > of some back-end applications. For instance, if I remember > right, dist sets an environment variable to tell "send" or "post" > to at the "Resent-to:" header field instead of "To:", and so on. > (Most of that stuff is documented in the online version of the > book at http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mh/book/ . Try an index search > for "environment". I haven't completely updated this for nmh.) > > One quick way to track down the problem might be to compare an > older nmh installation with a newer one. Make a sendproc script, > or a postproc script, like this: > > #!/bin/sh > echo "$0 environment:" > env > echo "$0 arguments:" > echo "$*" > exit 1 > > (You set "sendproc:" -- and, I think, "postproc:" -- from the > .mh_profile file.) Send similar messages from both systems > and see if something is different. I have no idea if that will > help; it's just an idea. > > Jerry > -- > Jerry Peek, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.jpeek.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Nmh-workers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers > -- Vish Parakala
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
