Jon Steinhart writes: > Some of you may recall that after improving attachment-sending in nmh, I've > had some wild ideas about how to improve attachment handling on the reading > end. What I had been thinking about was to have scan listings report the > components of multipart messages on separate lines, so if message 100 had two > parts there would be a scan listing for 100.1 and 100.2 that could be accessed > separately via show. Fear of m_getfld has kept me from trying this.
Hi, I'm just wondering how many people are working on improving attachment-sending in nmh. It's definitely an interest of mine, particularly sending named attachments, but I haven't done much nmh development yet, so I'm sure no one else knows of my interest. Perhaps all of us should coordinate and collaborate rather than submit a bunch of similar patches simultaneously? Either way, it's roughly the start of the holiday season, which brings a lot of hustle and bustle in addition to vacation days, and here's another reminder for those of us who planned on hacking on nmh near the end of the year. :) Arun _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
