Paul Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >initialisation. The question is how to deal with these because it'd be
>> >nice if we could prevent the compiler warnings. In some ways I think it
>> >is wrong to needlessly assign 0 to such variables because it implies to
>> >someone reading the code that the variable needs to be initialised to 0
>> >and that that value has a purpose.
>>
>> I often have a manfiest constant WHO_CARES,
>>
>> #define WHO_CARES (void*)012345
>
>isn't sort of setting yourself up for shooting yourself in the foot, in case
>the
>program logic _is_ wrong, and you didn't notice? in general i take the course
>of safety, and initialize to something that will cause the least pain if it
>did get used.
I usually take the opposite course, or at least try to. I want to know about
errors in program logic as soon and as often as possible. I would rather that
bugs hit me when I can do something about them.
I grant that your approach has its merits.
Norman Shapiro
798 Barron Avenue
Palo Alto CA 94306-3109
(650) 565-8215
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
