> but more importantly, there's no way to easily view messages in a
> sequence (like your "thread", above), sequentially, right? if
> not, then simply getting the message numbers of the thread isn't
> all that useful, since i still can't easily read them in order.
>
> i want to isolate the thread, and then be able to prev and next
> through it. so i think your method might be okay, if there were
> a "-seq" option to prev and next, which meant "next in sequence".
What Jerry has said, and much more, is covered in the mh-sequence man
page.
Cheers,
- Joel
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
