I know all are giddy about the release of nmh 1.2 (will be compiling
it this weekend), but I am curious as to how to resolve the following
situation:

On my office workstation, I use a different logon id than my email
address (as given to me by the corporation I work for).  I have solved
that by adding

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

to every one of the various *comp* files in ~/Mail/
I've also added 

masquerade: draft_from

to /etc/nmh/mts.conf

The problem seems to occur with Bcc in that I get the following:

From: "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: $10 Linux answering machine
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:33:40 -0500

------- Blind-Carbon-Copy

To: 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: $10 Linux answering machine
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:33:40 -0500


The problem is that if someone replies having received the message
on the Bcc, it gets sent to a non-deliverable email address.

Is this a MTA issue (not MUA)?
Am I missing something to configure?  Is this standard for the 
appropriate RFCs?  Can nmh honor the From:/Reply-To: on a Bcc??

Thanks!

jerry

Proud MH/nmh since 1987

       //  Jerry Heyman      | "Software is the difference between
      //   Amiga Forever :-) |  hardware and reality"
  \\ //    [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | 
   \X/


_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Reply via email to