In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jon Steinhart writes: > > I'm still confused. What I think I hear you saying is that you can't > patch and compile a version on a machine without GNU m4. What I'm > not clear on is whether you can compile a version that was already > correctly patched.
As a "workaround" I patched the nmh source code on a machine that has both autoconf and GNU m4 installed (in some way, it is the same steps nmh developers will do to make a new release from the CVS repository, though). But the patched tarball has problems building on machines that do not have GNU m4 installed. Don't know if it is a new bug or my fault (more probably the latter). Cheers, Igor. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
