Igor Sobrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe that IMAP support should be done mapping the files in the > mail server on a local in-memory filesystem as MFS, tmpfs, kernfs or > procfs do.
That's an OS-dependent solution. Let's think simple here. Local caching of remote files (remote == !MH format) with an event-based cache manager. i.e. annotate the file locally, signal the manager to sync. > This way, commands should not need to be rewritten. They shouldn't have to be. MH already has nice hooking features. Time to add a couple more hooks. > I certainly would forgot any change that adds superfluous complexity > to the software. But certainly related software projects can > achieve these goals. > > Just my opinion... it is the reason I really like MH. It is simple, > small, fast and powerful... as Unix! Whee! -- Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wookimus.net/ assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */ _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
