> Perhaps you should create a new utility that writes build directives > and works both interactively and non-interactively, depending on the > command line options? If it is able to write both directives and > attachment headers, whatnow can use it for a *really* versatile way to > attach stuff, and it could also be used from many UNIX editors with > a shell.
At this point, I don't see sufficient need. Build directives are straightforward. I have only ever used two, one for text and one for application attachments, and never had to change their structure. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
