On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:33:40 EST, Paul Fox said: > i believe there was consensus that a) this behavior was a result > of a problem with the original content encoding, and that b) the > nmh decoder should be more tolerant when decoding, and simply > pass mis-codings through untouched.
I'd have to think *real* hard about that. I suspect that passing mis-codings through without a complaint is possibly setting us up for a nasty security exposure. I'm not convinced that it isn't possible to create an intentional bad encoding that causes issues further down the line.
pgpbr99SxVRX9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
