Robert Elz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 16:02:48 -0400 > From: Paul Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > | so -- how important is it to use In-reply-to in a new References > | header if there was no previous References header? > > Not very...
Why do you think so? Remember the "liberal in what you receive, conservative in what you send" philosophy. Using In-Reply-To to seed the References helps to preserve a bit of threading information from broken mailers. > | the default nmh template doesn't do it. should we care? > > Yes, we should care, and no, the template should not do it, or at least, > not without lots more support in the form of new format functions. Assuming we could a) pull the Message-Id out of an old-style In-Reply-To, or b) punt and ignore it if it's in the old style, you'd be for it though, right? -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
