Hi Paul, > joel wrote: > > 1) Some people have commented on the comp.mail.mh newsgroup that Bcc > > and Dcc headers should not be removed before Fcc is processed, so > > that the Fcc copy contains them. Since the default components has > > Fcc: +outbox in it I'm inclined to agree. Does anyone disagree? > > Perhaps there should be an option to "send" for this so we can have > > it both ways, but I honestly don't see what could be desirable about > > the current behaviour. > > isn't the risk that, if you forward someone a copy from your outbox, > that it will contain the bcc headers?
Agreed. Besides, I've always found fcc useless. It doesn't expand local user names, e.g. `to: ralph' stays like that instead of becoming `to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]', and there's no message-id which is vital for referring someone back to an earlier email. I dcc myself and file that copy instead. It too doesn't keep track of invisible recipients but then that's good because of the forwarding danger Paul points out. I suppose some meta-data outside of the email file could keep track of such things in son-of-MH. Cheers, Ralph. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
