> > Not too fussed about obscure bugs personally, core functionality seems fine= > to me. Apologies to those for whom it's not the case. > > I'm more concerned about nmh dying. If people have to compile from source,= > there's a reasonable chance they won't bother. I'd love to see up-to-date= > rpm and deb packages get included in the common repositories (redhat/ubunt= > u/etc). This would probably be the best way to bring in new users in my op= > inion. >
It's in Fedora at least (I maintain it there). I don't ever expect nmh to be in Red Hat Enterprise Linux, as they only have a finite amount of engineering power, and there is certainly not enough demand for nmh. The easiest way to get nmh running on RHEL4 is going to be this: Download this: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/source/SRPMS/nmh-1.2-20070116cvs.4.fc9.src.rpm (it's the Fedora 9 nmh source rpm) Run: rpmbuild --rebuild nmh-1.2-20070116cvs.4.fc9.src.rpm At the very end you should see something like this: Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/nmh-1.2-20070116cvs.4.i386.rpm Just install that rpm. -- JB _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
