Peter Maydell wrote: >Anyway, for SASL, I wonder if this is the same problem as mentioned >here for mutt: > >http://osdir.com/ml/security.cyrus.sasl/2006-09/msg00010.html
I set up a spare machine with an SMTP server with SASL enabled so I could test this, and reproduced the problem. In fact it turns out to be something different: sasl_decode64() could return SASL_CONTINUE as well as SASL_OK on success. I've fixed this in CVS (and will put it in the 1.3 release too). The patch below may or may not apply on the very elderly 1.2 the original submitter has. -- PMM _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
