Right. feature based. Finally an opportunity to make myself get better and hopefully quicker at doing things right. I regret all the now stale open source patches never submitted because I never got back to doing them right.
And thanks for noticing the other glitches I had not included in my submission - I thought I had added memmove.c to COMPAT but had looked right at dtimep.lex and missed it -- I had even hand executed that Makefile line while checking for sources of realloc usage which might be problematic for SunoS4.1.4. Nice to have an extra pair of eyes :) russ On Sun, 04 May 2008 18:59:10 +0100 Peter Maydell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Russell Ruby wrote: ... >>Seems like making these general enough for submission would require >>adding new specific tests to configure.in along with macro definitions. > >Yes, that would be the way to go -- new macros ought to be feature-based, >not platform-based. (Or, as with the realloc issue you mention, the code >should just be written for the lowest common denominator). > >-- PMM > > >_______________________________________________ >Nmh-workers mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
