On Tue, 06 May 2008 10:29:02 EDT, David Levine said: > > >It's always been that way. I think that we should retain the > > >original nmh capability, just change the default build configuration. > > > > "Meh". I actually think "it's always been that way" is kind of a lousy > > reason to not have a capability (and I think you have it backwards: > > preventing the user from doing something isn't a "capability"). > > By "capability", I mean this: the installer of nmh can > prevent a mortal user from using masquerading. > > There certainly are plenty of ways for mortal users to > sidestep this prevention, of course. But why should we > change the behavior of nmh when we don't need to? It's easy > to change the default nmh configuration (to something that > many of us seem to use, anyway).
I'd definitely vote for "change the default but keep the config option for those sysadmins that need it"...
pgpXuPBALNplT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
