I say go for it. If this ends up breaking nmh for someone we can fix it then. If no-body complains it's less work.
Thanks (谢谢). Jeff Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote: > I was doing some work on the smtp code for nmh, and I couldn't help noticing > that it has no IPv6 support. > > Does anyone have any strong feelings about moving nmh to the use of > getaddrinfo()/struct sockaddr_storage (and all of the associated goo > for doing IPv6 support)? Can this change just be made wholesale, or do > people still want to use nmh on systems which do not support > getaddrinfo() and struct sockaddr_storage, and thus we need some > autoconf glue? > > (Making this change will result in a simplification of a lot of code, so > I think it's worthwhile just on it's own). > > --Ken > > > _______________________________________________ > Nmh-workers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers > > -- Jeffrey C. Honig <[email protected]> http://www.honig.net/jch GnuPG ID:14E29E13 <http://www.honig.net/jch/key.shtml> _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
