since i'm sure others have thought about this in the past, i have to ask, even though i think the answer is "no":
can anyone see a way of integrating the mh notion of per-message storage with the maildir notion of per-message storage? i've been trying to think of schemes involving hard- or soft-links, or other ways of rationalizing the namespace differences (i.e., numeric mh names vs. time-inode-host maildir names). but i'm coming up short. the idea, of course, would be to move mh to a more popular, and better-supported mailstore. i might even be willing to sacrifice esoteric mh features that might depend on properties of the mh store, as long as most basic functionality were preserved. paul =--------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 27.0 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
