Earl Hood wrote: >BTW, I'm working on removing all uses of mktemp from the code >and trying to clean-up annoying warnings from gcc when compiling >code.
Ah, good. I had a bit of a go at that a while ago but ran aground on some of the less trivial bits. >Hopefully, I do not break anything. I'll try things it out for awhile >to see if anything breaks, but I do not use all the features of nmh, >so some changes will not really get tested. I've taken the approach >of creating new functions that use mkstemp() and replacing all calles >to m_scratch() and m_tmpfil() with the new functions. > >I'm unsure what the policy is for how stable the trunk is supposed >to be, so I hesitant to check in what I have done. Well, the trunk shouldn't be deliberately broken, but we don't have a "policy" as such :-) Send the diffs to the mailing list (particularly useful since this is a security-related change) and if nobody yells about them you can commit, I guess. -- PMM _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
