Thanks for your reply. :-)
[2010-04-12 11:20] Jerrad Pierce <[email protected]> > Section 4.4 Re: filters > > `pick` is a mail-aware grep-like filter > I use it in a chain-like way via: > alias pscan 'scan `pick !:*`' #tcsh I needed the -list option to make pick print message numbers. Did the default change for this? Because the man page includes this usage of pick too, but with nmh-1.3, it does not work without -list. However, thanks for pointing this out, it's a good example. I think I'll add this. > Section 4.5 Re: IMAP > You should probably revisit the list discussion and include some of the > points? > For instance, most of those who spoke up seem to support falling back on the > Unix Way and farming out IMAP support to some other tool, be that a FUSE layer > or something else. Some IMAP features would not be readily available, but the > general mailstore would be, at no cost to us... I know about this approach and generally support it, but what is the difference to ftpfs, sshfs, or NFS then? With this approach, IMAP would just map a remote directory into the local directory tree. I don't know much about IMAP, but Wikipedia lists ``server-side searches'' for instance. This would not be possible. Do you understand my point? If IMAP would just map a directory, then it has nothing to do with MH. Any other FUSE layer would be equally good. IMAP and MH do not fit well together, but you can use IMAP in a way, so that MH sees no difference. > Re: habits > > exmh is not pretty, but mh-e has its followers, and is no worse (and indeed > better for not tying up a terminal, just a buffer) than elm/pine/mutt. Thanks for the information. Unfortunately, for many people you're already a geek when you use elm/pine/mutt. ;-) meillo _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
