On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:43:01 PDT, Lyndon Nerenberg said: > On 10-10-05 2:14 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > What should the code do on systems that have both <utmp.h> and <utmpx.h>? > > utmpx is the new POSIX flavour, so I'd defer to it over utmp in that case.
Sorry, my mind blanked for a bit when I saw comment that it needs to be guarded with a freebsd version check. We have autoconf, why isn't that doing the heavy lifting for us?
pgpKDDplH2MYe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
