>> i strongly suggest that KPOP not be deprecated unless you can prove >> there are no sites using Kerberized POP. > >You are still running Kerberos IV? Really?
Minor nit: you can still do Kerberos V with KPOP. Works just fine, and we did it for years. Mike, I think your Kerberos information is ... well, a bit out of date. Any OS that ships with Kerberos today is using Kerberos V by default. You can still do Kerberos IV with MacOS X, but I suspect that capability will be gone as of 10.6. The point is really moot ... I had forgotten that as part of the normalization of sbr/client.c to the new networking interfaces, I had garbage-collected all of the old KPOP code. I don't think I sent any email out about this, but it seems that no one noticed. If you see any code which has an #ifdef KPOP, rip it out! Unless someone is actually proposing adding that code back in. I won't stand in your way if you really want to do that, but I reserve the right to make fun of you. Actually, it turns out I DID send out email about this back when I proposed removing it. No one spoke up for it then: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2009-01/msg00013.html So KPOP is gone, and I don't really see a reason for it to come back. Of course, you can still do standards-compliant Kerberos authentication via SASL. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
