On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:30:31 EST, JerryHeyman said: > I see that at http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers, port 465 is called > "urd", but on my Mandriva 2009.1 Linux system I see: > > [je...@unix smtp]$ grep 465 /etc/services > smtps 465/tcp # SMTP over SSL (TLS) > > I apologize for my ignorance, I actually thought that the info in my local > /etc/services would be accurate, especially as AT&T called it the same thing.
Common confusion. IANA is the 'de jure' standard, /etc/services is the 'de facto' standard. Trying to claim that the actual real-world use of 465 is "illegal" is just urinating into the wind, because there's a heck of a lot of the broken (yes, it's non-standard compliant - using the STARTTLS verb on 587 is correct) SMTP on 465 than there is 'urd' (whatever *that* is).
pgpWpRRLsGivv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
