> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Earl Hood wrote: > >>> As for space between encoded word, such space should be > >>> collapsed. I.e. Two adjacent encoded words should be > >>> concatenated together after decoding, with no space between > >>> them. > >> > >> Where in what RFC do you find this. RFC2047 section 5, (1) says that > >> encoded > >> words must be separated from each other by linear white space but doesn't > >> say > >> that that white space is later removed. > > FYI, see the examples in section 8. It clearly shows that the space > between encoded words should be stripped in final rendering. > > --ewh
My days in ANSI and ISO keep me from looking at examples as normative. These examples are in comments, not the general case. I read your preference as having a complete parser for every RFC since the dawn of time which began in 822. I could do that, but it seems like it would be complex and slow. Maybe I should try it, it might not be unbearably slow. Time to roll out lex and yacc. Jon _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
