Hi, markus schnalke wrote: > > BTW, I would suggest using isascii() rather than (*p > 127 || *p < 0). > > I just kept what you once wrote. ;-P > But, yes, you are right.
Given it's `char *p' then *p may be unsigned on some systems, e.g. ARM, and a compiler could warn on testing if it's negative so isascii() is much nicer. :-) Cheers, Ralph. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
