Oliver Kiddle wrote: >undo of install-mh > Nobody would ever run an uninstall-mh script and I doubt that the > person raising the bug was a user looking for it. Most software > creates a pile of dot files without even asking these days. If > any fix is necessary, I'd vote for a tiny bit more detail in the > man page - less than the original patch included.
What did you think of my proposed patch to the manpage? >gcc warnings: possible use of uninitialized data > I'm not so keen on initialising variables that don't need > initialising. That said, it'd be good to kill a few compile > warnings. See my email on those -- I think the ones not yet committed are ones where there's a genuine bug to be fixed (or an obvious but larger code cleanup), and should not be squashed just by putting an initialisation on the variable. >I would have thought the following would be uncontroversial. > >improvement of folder man page >-link instead of -unlink in rmm.man >small fix for configure.in (nmhman expansion) >slocal.man .TP > >Any objections if I apply those? I thought I'd committed at least some of those to the cvs repo. -- PMM _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
