>> I'd be up for doing this, but with one huge caveat: only if we throw >> out all of the current Makefiles and use Automake instead. Given Automake's >> current support for subdirectories, we could ditch the use of recursive >> make, which in my mind is a pretty big win. > >[ Sorry to be late to the party -- I'm on the road right now and waay >behind on email.] > >I don't understand how the two are even related.
Note that I said, "_I'm_ up for doing this, but ...". By that I mean if I'm going to mess around with the nmh Makefiles again (something I loath to do), then the only way _I'm_ going to do it is if we convert to Automake. I see David Levine just added a spec file and the Makefile targets, but I'd still rather convert everything over to Automake as part of the Autoconf/libtool work. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
