>Sorry, I forgot to mention that I tried that already... Sorry Jeff, I should have guessed that. I just thought maybe you weren't familiar with "git blame".
>I'm going to peruse here to see if there is some explaination of why it's >that way and if the reason is still valid: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/rand-mh/ I was curious about this as well, so I took a look. I see there's still call to m_foil() in post back in MH 5. So I am guessing the answer is, "we've always done it that way". I see that the READ-ME for MH 5 is dated ... sweet Jesus, January 19th, 1985. Suddenly I feel young again! There are a few ChangeLog entries that imply that the m_foil() code was added by Marshall Rose, and he's still alive, isn't he? If people care, someone could always email him and ask him about it (note: I am NOT volunteering; I have nothing against Marshall Rose, I'm just not motivated enough to bother). I was always under the impression that "post" was designed to be called by another program ("send"), so maybe the thinking was that you should put "post" stuff in the user's mh_profile entry for "send". Actually, this begs another question ... why are they seperate programs, anyway? It always has chapped my ass that if I add a new switch that deals with a new sending email feature I have to add it to both send and post. Is there a reason that they aren't the same program? --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
