On 1/5/2012 2:51 AM, Jeffrey Honig wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 21:34, Ken Hornstein <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > The default has been to build with mh-e support, and I suspect > that very > few people have NOT built nmh with mh-e support so I doubt that it is > causing many problems. I propose removing the configure option > and associated > #ifdefs so that mh-e support is always included in nmh. Comments? > > > I'd like to audit them and see if we actually use them (we being mh-e > developers). Features that are actually used should always be enabled > *and* documented.
i was going to say the same. brian reid wrote the original mhe, for which these features were added. someone else wrote the current gnu-emacs "mh-e" package, which shares no code with brian's original, and may not be using these options. so i'm +1 to jch above: whatever is used should remain, should be the default, and should be documented; whatever is not used (which i think may be 100% of it) should be removed.
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
