Jerrad wrote: > I do not think msh should be discarded. At worst, a build time option, > but you never know when you might want/need it, so why not build it? > It's a single, documented useful utility that provides a useful > complement to packf. I've not had *much* call for it, but it's nice > to know it's there if I do want to interact with a mail archive in a > familiar way.
Paul wrote: > fwiw i still like msh. i've used it as a login shell for some captive > accounts. Thanks. Let's keep msh. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
