>Errr... no. This has nothing to do with lack of capabilities in nmh. >I use the envelope addressee because it's the canonical source of >data that tells you to whom the message was addressed. But if it's >not available, then no amount of work done by nmh can compensate >for the missing data. In that case, you could instead match on the >To/Cc lines and accept that most of the time it will be fine, but >in some cases it'll get it wrong. You can do this with nmh today >using replcomps.
I guess my point was that it doesn't seem like we have enough smarts today in mh-format to do everything I want to do; at least it doesn't seem like it's possible today, or if it is it would be something that would be very close to being completely unreadable. But I could be wrong. But since we have a number of people saying they would like to see something new added to nmh, sounds like we either need to document things better, fix some bugs or add a few things in mh-format, or add something new. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
