On 1/27/2012 2:37 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote: >> Does par do anything "better" than doing "gqap" in Vim? I'm recollection, >> albeit from a few years ago, is that par inferior. > Hm, I just tried it on the paragraph above, and it seems to do > alright. Not sure how to easily judge whether or not it's "better" > than par, though. Of course, the line breaking in the current mhl > still means you have to manually fix up broken lines.
i expect that 'vim' cannot run as a filter the way 'par' or 'fmt' can, so the relevance of its feature level to MH's problem set is eluding me. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
